« Too little too late. India versus England. 1st. Test Day 5. Nagpur. | Main | Giants laid low. India versus England. 1st. Test Day 3. Nagpur. »

Fortune (and umpires) favour the brave. India versus England. 1st. Test Day4. Nagpur.

The best that India can do is save this match and, that, is not guaranteed. A depleted English side is playing better than the Indians in their own backyard. It seems that the Indian test team is in need of surgery too.

I avoid making any adverse comments on the umpiring but the umpires in this match ( Aleem Dar and I L Howell) are not covering themselves in glory. This test has been marked by some very poor decisions, particularly from Aleem Dar. More on that later.

Sreesanth got a dubious lbw desicion early and the Indians were all out for 323, giving England a lead of 70 runs. England then scored 297 for 3 for a total lead of 367 at the end of the day's play. A declaration has not come  yet. I would have scored a little faster for the last hour of play today and declared to give the Indians an uncomfortable few overs at the end today. England missed a trick here. With 7 wickets in hand, Flintoff and Jones still to come, they should have given the flat Indian bowling the charge. This may make the difference between a morale boosting draw and an outright win for them. For the Indians, this test will feel like a defeat even if they manage a draw.

Alastair Cook played very well for a debutant, scoring an unbeaten 104. He was lucky to survive two dropped catches. Pietersen was also dropped twice and incorrectly given not out by the third umpire. Batting on 36, Pietersen played a half volley to Kumble who took the catch. The batsman stood his ground and Mr. Howell, who had a good view was unsure if the ball had hit the ground off the toe of the bat. He should have done better than that, but fair enough, he referred it to Mr. Shivram, the third umpire. Mr. Shivram looked at it from all available angles and it clearly looked out. Amazingly, Shivram was not convinced and gave the benefit of doubt to Pietersen who went on to score 87 priceless runs.

A batsman usually knows when he has hit the ball on the ground and Pietersen should have walked. The English players have over the last few months pushed the envelope on the rules and this is yet another instance of 'strategy' in the modern game. You just have to stand your ground on a close decision because you know that if there is any room for doubt or the camera does not get the perfect angle you are going to get the benefit at the expense of the bowling side. I think it is cynical and unfair, but the game is not about  fairplay anymore.

Aleem Dar has been aggressive about his umpiring in this test. It is good to be confident with your decisions but an umpire cannot always be sure about every question asked of him. No umpire can have a yes and no answer to every appeal. There is no shame in being unsure and giving the batsman the benefit of doubt - that is the way it is supposed to be. He has given some aggressive decisions and has been wrong at least 4 times ( Harmison, Flintoff, Dravid and Sreesanth). Even though Sachin was probably out, few umpires would have given a decision that close. Mr. Howell, on the other hand has been at the other end of the spectrum in not giving plumb lbws. Mr. Shivram needs to get his eyes examined before taking any further part in this test.

I recognize that the umpires have a tough job and will make a few mistakes. I feel no joy in criticizing them but there have been just too many errors in this match. While I have been very critical of the performance of the Indians, they have suffered some really poor decisions. If Dravid had not been incorrectly given out on day 3, who knows which way this match would have gone? I hope the umpiring review committee critically evaluates the performance of the 'elite' umpires in this match. Aleem Dar, in particular, should look at the tapes to realize that his 'confidence' in giving decisions may be sometimes misplaced. 

Enough about umpires. Pathan bowled well after lunch after an ordinary opening spell. Sreesanth toiled without reward. Kumble bowled well and was very unlucky with dropped catches and umpiring errors. Bhajji, as always, turned the ball but failed to get wickets - the reasons for that are well known. Both the catching and the ground fielding today were very poor.

Champion players and teams have a way of raising their game when in trouble. Think Roger Federer and Shane Warne. I am afraid this Indian team is yet to display that quality in recent tests. I think the Indians are in serious trouble here. While they may be saved by a lack of ambition from this young English side, a loss is quite possible. A win is only a pipe dream.

 

Posted on Saturday, March 4, 2006 at 09:21 by Registered Commenter-- Third Umpire | Comments2 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

England have definitely had more than the rub of the green with umpiring decisions in the match.

As regards the "lack of ambition" of the England team I think they've been surprised to find themselves in this position.They've exceeded thir own expectations in this game. They've been expecting the "trial by spin" and it hasn't arrived.
March 4, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRolla
I agree. I've been saying for a while now that Kumbles and Harbhajan have become pretty predictable and lack the ability to surprise batsmen. In addition, this english team plays spin better than teams of the past.

It is a shame that the selectors continue to play Harbhajan on reputation alone and refuse to take a chance by giving Piyush Chawla a break.

The English team has shown admirable courage and application. Their success is well deserved.
March 4, 2006 | Registered Commenter-- Third Umpire

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.